Conflicting Perspectives Essay

As ro domain type Emperor Marcus Aurelius once suggested Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth embodying the smell that conflicting perspectives are held by different people towards both events and individuals. I believe that this universal root is held true in William Shakespeares production Julius Caesar, discussing the conflict surrounded by Brutus, Cassius and Antony, Richard Glovers Sydney Morning Herald term imbibe a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream, debating against the depreciation of the respect over radio come outs between generations, and Frank Capras classic film Mr. metalworker Goes to uppercase, which take outes the triumph of American ideals through and through the conflicting morals of Senator Jefferson Smith and Joseph Paine. In each we see how the respective composers have spendd briny protagonists as well as various literary and cinematic devices to express the theme of conflicting perspectives and work out the au take placences reception.During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeares hitice of Antony incorporates that of a change, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar embodied in his vow When Caesar says, Do this, it is performed. Antonys dutiful tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve Caesar, (his) lord. In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus inner confusion to the stall he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the disloyal desires he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk below his huge legs. Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesars authority as a leader, such(prenominal) a feeble temper should so get the start of the maje stic world. by-line the assassination of Caesar, differing perspectives arise when these two protagonists present speeches to the plebeians of Rome in Act 3 Scene 2. Brutus natural, humble tone both calms and directs the crowd tobelieve Caesars death was for The good of Rome Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? With the use of a rhetorical perplexity and repetition in his words, such as valiant, honour and Caesar the ambitious, Brutus is able to influence and manipulate the plebeians to what he considers the correct viewpoint let Brutus be Caesar In sheer contrast, Antony uses sarcastic, derogatory terms against Brutus to allow the crowd to truly question Brutus honour and nobility. Caesar was my friend, faithful and just to me, but Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus was an honourable man. Antonys repetition of Brutus was an honourable man forms into sarcasm, thus influencing the crowd to disregard Brutus morality and entrust that Cassius deems the truthful perspective of Caesar.Relatedly, Richard Glovers article indite November 2nd, 2013 Take a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream demonstrates the differing perspectives of audiences appreciating radio broadcasting over time. As stated by Glover, who himself is the protagonist as he is a radio presenter, listeners would tolerate willingly any radio station aired at the time Adults would endure a program designed for 12-year-olds. Now, as a way out of the growing social media There is a need to instantly inform the broadcaster of their song decision. Glovers repetition of outrage and annoyance, provides us with a strong observation of his view on the matter and what he sees to be the correct opinion, whilst coherently outlining the immense change in perspective of a common audiences viewpoint on radio stations over the years resulting from social media, which is same to Antonys speech.The protagonist Brutus and his association with honour stands a key notion in Shakespeares Julius Caesar. after(prenominal) the assassination of Caesar, conflicting perspectives arise when Brutus suspects that Cassius has been dishonourable by taking bribes, Cassius, you yourself/ are much condemned to have an urge palm. In response Cassius retorts I an itching palm?, with an exclamatory tone, provoking a fight. through the use of emotive language and sickness imagery, such as mollycoddleion, bleed, and contaminate, Brutus spells out his scorn towards such poor principles and his powerful closing lines I had rather be a dog and bay the moon/ thansuch a Roman cement this stance on the matter, whilst stating that he considers that his view on honour is the truthful viewpoint.Comparably, the related text of Frank Capras 1939 film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington effectively represents the conflicting values of corruption and honour. Capras protagonist the amateur senator Jefferson Smith rises to express his knowledge that the scheme of a Defici ency Bill for a dam is fraudulent and that various corrupt congressmen are attempting to use it for their sustain profit A man who controls a political machine, a Mr. jam Taylor, was powerful enough to buy men and put them in this congress to legislate his graft Through the use of an honest, pleading tone and low angle shots, Capra successfully provides Smith with a paramount and commanding image, captivating and entertaining his audience whilst showing that his perspective was truly the correct one. Evidently, Senator Joseph Paine attempts to prevent Smith from exposing the truth and abolishing his reputation numerous times. Capra has manipulated the light to give his glasses a white gleam, providing the obstructionist with a spiteful frontage. Paine finally embraces an accusative tone and boldly declares that Senator Smith has told lie upon lie and now, he is trying to blackmail this Senate as he tried to blackmail me before he ultimately storms off in rage.In Shakespeares Juli us Caesar, Frank Capras Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and Richard Glovers Take a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream, each composer has uniquely represented the theme of conflicting perspectives by potation upon devices specific to their textual form. These texts also hold the topic statement true, as protagonists do believe their own viewpoint is correct.