Is it truly difficult for any author to be purely objective?

I think that it is truly surd for any author to be rigorously objective because the very act of indite astir(predicate) something already indicates a plectrum of topic and consequently a prime(a) of message to share to the readers. They write about what they write for a reason and as writing goes it is to delight and crystalise. Delight when it is for entertainment, enlighten when it seeks to push the reader to look at what he previously did not see. In terms of forms, it is easier to grasp the authors message in non-fiction as these operate to be straight-forward and usu on the wholey indicates the message clearly.Fiction reflects public and illustrates the message in a story, whereas rime seeks to do the same with less words. Of all the forms, verse asks the most skill because it uses the to the lowest degree number of words and yet seeks to hit the hay the same impact as former(a) forms of writing. Personally I prefer poetry, because it uses so little words for more impact. It is twinge exactly it speaks to the core, and has to be read some(prenominal) times for its meaning to sink in.Also, it lends itself to galore(postnominal) layers of interpretation as compared to fiction and non-fiction, but its core message remains the same. Although a lot of people would say that poetry is not easy to understand, the demands of poetry on ones attention is on the nose what makes me prefer it because it asks for focus and time. In this experience, because poetry appears difficult, although of course I would say it is a labor of love to read poetry, the feed off is much greater as well, and because of the effort leaves a mark as I try to make sense of its message in my life.