Death on the Nile: Novel and Film Essay

Agatha Christies 1937 tonic Death on the Nile ( able by Nancy Taylor for Penguin Readers in 2008) tells the murder mystery impertinent of a rich, upper-class and offspring woman her name is house finch Ridgeway who marries the fianc of her best friend Jacqueline. Linnet and her economise Simon go to Egypt to spend their honeymoon in that location. Jacqueline observes begrudge from Linnet because she steals her fianc from her, so she keeps sideline them everywhere they go. In the mediate of the trip Linnet murders while she is on her honeymoon in the Nile. There ar many suspects on the ride because many hatful hate her and affirm a motive for drink downing her. The tec Poirot who is in the same boat tries to figure push through who pour downs Linnet and solves the problem. One major theme of the saucy is how enviousness leads the person to kill otherwises. The movie version of Agatha Christies popular novel Death on the Nile was released in September 1978, produce d by Paramant Picture, directed by John Guillermin, and adapted for the screen by Anthony Shaffer.In this paper I will comparison and contrast the manner in which one element has been adapted by the holdmakers and I will offer a hypothesis active why recordmakers make this change in addition, I will synthesize the sound judgements of 2 film critics. One significant plot element that appears in the novel and that adapted for the film version concerns Colonel Race. The character of Colonel Race in the novel is overall similarity from the film. In the novel, Colonel Race is a man who travels down the ball and solving important cases for the British government. The branch time he shows in the novel is in Abu Simbel when he visits the temple whereas, in the film the first time he shows in the hotel in Cairo with the first group. too in the novel he has a motive for organism in the boat and it is to follow Signor Richetti who is a flagitious and dissembling to be a nonher pers on with a fake job, but in the film there isnt any reason for Colonel Race to be on the boat with them. On the other hand, there are third similarities between the novel and the film about Colonel Race character.In novel and in the film Poirot is an old friend of Colonel Race and they meet apiece other after a long period of time. Also in the novel and the film Colonel helps his old friend Poirot whos a detective to find out the crime and Colonel is monitoring others to mesmerize who kills Linnet, Mrs. Otterbourne, and Miss Louise. Also in the novel and the film, there isnt any motive for Colonel to kill Linnet. But, why did the adaptors make these changes? Perhaps the film adaptors couldnt have forget how Colonel Race is in the book. For example, they couldnt have forgotten that Colonel Race was in the novel for a secret mission to look for a criminal named Signor Richetti. Also, they couldnt have forgotten that Colonel Race showed in the imprimatur group in half way through t he trip in Abu Simbel.They may have believed that if they bear away those events in the film, they will make it easy to understand what is going in the film. Also, not to make the movie heterogeneous by adding more events. Maybe if Colonel Race showed in the guerilla group, he will steal the audience attention from Jacqueline when she showed again in the second group. Also the audience will keep asking the question Whos this? in addition, Poirot will have someone to talk with from the beginning of the film and to show how they are very close to each other. In addition, they didnt mention a criminal who was following by Colonel Race to catch him. Thats why they will confuse the audience because they will not know to focus on a criminal Signor Richetti himself or on the other criminal who killed Linnet, Mrs. Otterbourne, and Miss Louise. Thus, it delayms likely that the film makers make their decision possibly to prevent confusion. Therefore, I think the decision to remove these events was uncorrupted.Overall, the way the filmmakers changed these events is great and well thought out. Reactions to the writing of Anthony Shaffer by both critics appear to be almost diametrically opposed. In his 2011 contemporary study in The Stop Button, anon. critic rates the film banly overall and he has some comments about writing. The anonymous critic says, The point of these Poirot films isnt necessarily the filmmaking or the writing, its the all-star cast-it must be the cast, since comparatively nothing happens for the first hour. The anonymous critic thinks that Shaffer writing is not good enough and it is apparently not as strong as he was expecting. Actually, the anonymous critic seems that he doesnt enjoy the writing section. Anthony Clarke opinion in his DVD.net.au review is the same as the anonymous opinion. Clarke has some reservations about the writing he has certain comments about Peter Ustinov.Clarke says, The plot has been thinned down from Agatha Christ ies original, the novel seems widely implausible. Clarkes review of Shaffers work is overall not good. At most, one might see the two opinions about Shaffers writing as negative since an anonymous critic says the word Isnt necessarily, and Anthony Clarke thinks that the writing is also negative when she says Trimmed down. The two responses to the writing of Anthony Shaffer in Death on the Nile are more similar than they are different. One major theme of the novel that I recognized and relate to is that how enviousness leads the person to kill others. throughout the novel and film, Jacqueline feels enviousness from Linnet because she steals her fianc and marries him. Jacqueline decides to bother Linnet and destroys her life.Especially there are many people hate Linnet and feel envy from her because of many reasons. At the end Linnet murders by someone who feels envy from her and hates her very much. I can think of many examples of people who feel envy from others and finally the re sult is murdering them, but one example stands out strongly among all others. I knew my cousin neighbor and they are from Kuwait. Their neighbor called Fatima and she has three small children. One day Fatima husband told her that he wish to bond another woman because our religion says that man can marry maximum four women. His wife Fatima cant prevent him so she kept silence all the time and her heart full of envy from her husband and the woman who will be his second wife. Her husband distinguishable to do a small wedding party in the tent.On the day of his wedding, Fatima wanted to destroy her husband wedding party. In the middle of the wedding, she set the tent on fire by using flatulence gallons. At the end, her husband and his new wife also some other guests died because what she had done. The police came and took her to the jail because its a murder case. So that, Fatima washed-up her life and her husband and others life because of her envy. So I suggest that people should take the life in easy way. They shouldnt feel envy about others because the result will harm and destroy them and others. I revalue people to try to delete the envy from their hearts and to accept the mankind of their life. People who feel envy from others they must know that everything in this world happens for a reason and they cant ignore their destiny and they have to accept it.Works CitedChristie, Agatha. Death on the Nile. Ed. Nancy Taylor. Harlow, England Pearson Education Limited, 2008. Print. Clarke, Anthony. Death on the Nile. DVD.net.au. DVD.net.au, n.d. Web. 24 July 2011. Death on the Nile. Dir. John Guillermin. Perf. Peter Ustinov, Lois Chiles, Mia Farrow, Simon MacCorkindale, David Niven. 1978. DVD. Anchor verbalise Entertainment, 2002. Death on the Nile. The Stop Button. The Stop Button, 23 Feb. 2011. Web. 24 July 2011.