Theories Explaining Juvenile Crime Essay -- Youth Criminal

Theories Explaining Juvenile CrimeMany theories, at both the large and micro level, turn in been proposed to explain juvenile offence. Some prominent theories entangle Social Disorganization theory, derived function gear Social Organization theory, Social rig theory, and Differential Association theory. When determining which theories are more valid, the question moldiness be explored whether people deviate because of what they learn or from how they are controlled? Mercer L. Sullivans book, Getting Paid Youth Crime and Work in the knowledgeable City clear suggests that the learning theories both at the macro level, Differential social organization, and micro level, Differential association theory, are the more blameless of the two types of theory.Two major sociological theories explain youth crime at the macro level. The first is Social Disorganization theory, created in 1969 by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay. The theory resulted from a study of juvenile delinquency in Chicago using information from 1900 to 1940, which attempts to answer the question of how aspects of the structure of a company contribute to social control. The study found that a community that is unable to achieve common values has a high set of delinquency. Shaw and McKay looked at the physical appearance of the neighborhoods, the average income of the state, the ethnicity of the neighborhood, the percent of renters versus owners, and how fast the population of the area changed. These factors all contribute to neighborhood delinquency. The text provides some picture to support this theory in Table 14, Index rankings of reported crimes in police incorporating the neighborhoods. This chart shows Projectville ranked highest in every category barely motor v... ...lton Park. For example, youths in Projectville were paid to burn down a building, succession in Hamilton Park the juveniles were arrested for the same crime. In Projectville, even the police leave buy stolen goods. The study discussed in the text clearly shows that crime in Hamilton Park is much lower than in either Projectville or La Barriada. The reasons for this are clearly explained by Sutherlands two learning theories, his differential social organization theory and his differential association theory. The other theories, Shaw and McKays social disorganization and Hirschis social control theory, do have some merits, but do not apply as clearly to the neighborhoods in the study. Clearly, Sutherlands theories of learned behavior and favorable and unfavorable definitions tenderize clear explanations for the crime in Projectville, La Barriada and Hamilton Park.