How do feminists view the division of labour

How do feminists medical prognosis the portion of moil deep down the family home? sy Chelb7 How do feminists attend the division of crusade within the family home? Feminism is a collection of move custodyts and whimsys aimed at delineate and defending wo handss rights within society and politics aiming for all round equation, A big issue that arises within women rights is in equality in the household. The division of labour in the home is how fairly the jobs atomic number 18 shared among the partners in the household.Sociologists named Young and Willmott carried out a select in 1937 in aethnal Green, London. They looked into the roles in families within the home and come to the conclusion that Over time most(prenominal) families befool become The symmetrical family. This implies roles are being shared between the man and women Within the home. They called this the contact Of progress. Feminists reject this March Of progress View as they say roles are non equal within the home. In a question there is register that men help at home just it is far from accordance within the roles.Feminists say that men usually take on to be helping by doing the pleasurable jobs sooner than the work, herefore research so far suggests feminists view the division of labour within the family home as unequal. Sociologist Ann Oakley disagrees with Young and Willmotts view. Rather than seeing a march of progress tonards symmetry since 19th century Ilke Young and Willmott do, Oakley describes how the housewife role has become the ascendant role tor married women. She also reasons that Men only ever help at home rather than work. Another sociologist staying Oakleys idea Is Mary Boulton (1983b.During research Boulton found that fewer than of husbands had a major ole in childcare. She argues that Young and Willmott hyperbolise mens contribution by lookng at tasks that involve childcare rather than responsibilities. When reviewing the research so far it becomes appare nt that women sociologists (particularly feminists) support the idea that men rarely take on tasks within the home and that male sociologists support that this is in fact improving and we are on a march towards progress, Twisting this biased view are two sociologists named Hilary Silver (1987) and Juliet Schor (1993).They argued that because of ommercialised exhaustively and services the housewife role has almost disappeared, They say that items such as freezers. microwave ovens and ready meals reduce the amount of domestic labour to be done, However critics argue that for poorer women this iS not an Option. Feminists argue that even though commercialization has been reduced the Other chores are still not shared equallyq The shock absorber Of gainful work iS a to a great extent recent debate in feminists. Logically if both man and women Of the house are in give complete time work feminists say that the housekeeping should be shared equally between the couple.Feminists argue th at this is not the case. women are being make to carry a dual burden. This outcome is determined in colossal part by traditional gender roles that have been accepted by society over time. on the other hand to the feminist view some sociologists argue that women functional In full time paid jobs lead to a more equal division of labour. Jonathan Gershuny (1994) found 83% of housework and those who worked part time still done 82%. Wives who worked full time did 73% of housework. Gershuny explains this trend towards greater equality in basis of gradual change in values and parental role models.He argues hearty values are gradually adapting to the fact more women are working full time. Similarly Oriel Sullivans (2000) analysis of nationally representative data collected in 1975, 1987 and 1997 found a trend towards greater equality as men did more domestic labour. Particularly there was an add-on in couples with an equal division with men doing more traditionally womens Jobs. Feminis ts view this division of labour as inaccurate. Equality and symmetry within housework would mean each partner is doing 50% of housework and chores.Whereas even sociologists who are gainst the feminist view towards domestic labour are showing in their results that well over 50% of housework is done by women. Sociologist Dunne (1999)done a study on 37 cohabiting lesbian couples with dependent children. Dunne found evidence of symmetry in their relationships. In lesbian relationships household tasks are not linked to a particular gender scripts. This allows lesbian couples to have more equal relationships. For example as one of the women said in Dunnes study In heterosexual relationships there is ceaselessly a subconscious belief that women are upposed to do the housework.This supports the radical feminist view that relationships between men and women are inevitably patriarchal and that women can only achieve equality in same sex relationships. Similarly, Jeffery Weeks (1999) argues t hat same sex relationships offer greater possibilities of equality because the division of labour is open to negotiation and agreement and not based on a patriarchal tradition. To conclude evidence shows that a women being in paid work leads to more equality in the division of labour, though probably only if she is in full work.Many feminists argue that in reality the effect of this is limited and women still continue to lift a dual or triple burden. Feminists argue that the root of the hassle is patriarchy. Patriarchy ensures that women earn less at work and therefore have less bargaining in the home. Patriarchal gender scripts shape societys expectations close the domestic roles within the house. In my opinion until the subconscious belief that women should do the domestic work has being changed by societys outlook feminists will always feel that patriarchy is the main reason for the inequality of labour within the home.